The case is loaded with circumstantial evidence. It is fully charged with racial & social undercurrents. Twelve men and women with twelve distinct points of view are lead behind closed doors to judge, and ultimately, to be judged. But who can judge fairly?
The case is loaded with circumstantial evidence. It is fully charged with racial & social undercurrents. Twelve men and women with twelve distinct points of view are lead behind closed doors to judge, and ultimately, to be judged. But who can judge fairly?
Because it is so close to 12 Angry Men, you can't help but make comparisons. I would have liked to see more of it all the way to conclusion as in 12 Angry Men with a masterful turnover, but this is not that. First of all, it's supposed to be a short so we don't have the time it would take to get a complete reversal. Second, that's not the point of this movie. It is a wonderful update of the idea. If twelve angry white men had a rough time because of disparate backgrounds imagine the problems in real juries with their rainbow coalitions. And that is the important statement here. And it's kind of scary.
I liked the experiment. The opening monologue was great. It could have moved quicker though to make this an even shorter short, but I enjoyed it nonetheless.
I liked the experiment. The opening monologue was great. It could have moved quicker though to make this an even shorter short, but I enjoyed it nonetheless.
Good show!